Sleeping Dragon
It is seriously missing one thing, though. Football.
I know I should probably reserve judgment until after I go to tonight’s game, but the footballlessness is really striking.
(Let me interrupt this blog entry to just say that the fish appetizer I am eating right now is absolutely delicious. Really top notch. An eagerly awaiting my crispy beef)
(Crispy beef has arrived. It’s a monumental disappointment after the fish because it appears to be – and I wish I were kidding about this - covered in mayonnaise).
Anyways, this is a bookstore with literature in translation from all over the world. The business section in particular is filled with books by Peter Drucker, Peter Lynch, et. al. The Maoism-Marxism-Leninism section seems to be part of “management”, so the Mao treatises are actually right next to the Drucker tomes. I find this shelving arrangement particularly amusing, though I can’t imagine either of them would.
(Yup. Mayonnaise. Or something hideously close to it.)
All of which made the football section of the bookstore a particularly weird place. With all the vast repertoire of different football books out there in all those languages available for translation, the football section contained a relatively slim 37 different monographs. Thirty-six of them were “how-to” books on training, tactics and conditioning; mostly, these were by local authors, with the exception for Charlie “Route One” Hughes’ book on football tactics, published by the English FA (which is either ominous or hilarious depending on your point of view). The other was a pictorial history of AC Milan.
A less intriguing line-up of books would be impossible to conceive. Even the most tedious and pedestrian of Beckham biographies would at least have brought Chinese readers some insight into some of the passion and culture associated with the game, but there was nothing, nada. This is Lobanovsky-ism run amok: the complete atomization of the game, an attempt at mastering of an art without appreciating its soul. There is probably an analogy here with the country’s approach to capitalism, but it’s a little beyond me at the moment as I’m well into my second
2 Comments:
Mayonnaise??
Did you get the restaurant recommendation from Lonely Planet too?
Were there many basketball books? The stock answer to all "why do we bother with China" questions tends to be that "if we get even one tenth of one percent of the population interested, we will be swimming in yuan".
The key to getting the Chinese excited about football clearly lies in publicising the opportunities for gambling. I look forward to your future dispatches from Macao.
"The stock answer to all "why do we bother with China" questions tends to be that "if we get even one tenth of one percent of the population interested, we will be swimming in yuan"."
Which, as company after company seeking to "tap the Chinese market" has discovered, doesn't amount to much money.
The cold fact for most companies is that even as foreign markets (primarily in Asia) constitute an increasingly important area, and increasingly account for sales *growth*, it's still not a cash cow. What people don't seem to realize is that while more money is being made now than ever, a goodly part of that is for the same reason movie tickets cost more now than ever. Values are higher, foreign markets are important to *growth*, but actual revenue comes from established markets, and everyone is dealing with slimmer (by proportion) revenue increases.
That doesn't stop company spokesmen from glowing about the "huge prospects" in China, India and the rest of Asia, and in a sense they're being honest. These markets represent the lion's share of "what's left" out there to turn into developed customer bases. It's where they have to be. It's where new growth will come from. But these are not markets from which a sea change in revenue will be arriving.
Post a Comment
<< Home